Another good reason for Webcams

I read a hilarious post by another blogger today... long story short... some 'ladies' were using library webcams to immortalize their breasts online.

Short story long...

First, the author claims her reaction was not ideal. She feels her loud and public statement of "what the hell is wrong with you" is somehow out of line. I disagree, and am having trouble coming up with a better response then that. I guess yelling something like "BOOBS!!" at the top of your lungs would have been a bit funnier, but not as appropriate. I would have given $20 to witness this whole scenario go down. If it was that funny to read, it would have been ROTFLMAO funny to see.

Reminds me of the time a fine young gentleman wanted me to help him upload some pictures to his website. I suckered right in of course. We put in the CD, went to the upload utility and looked thru the pics to see which ones to select. I just assumed we were looking for formal pics, or maybe some action shots taken while hiking or camping. There were some action shots allrighty! Picture of him butt nekkid fondling himself! Ok, ok, he was not fondling himself in all the pictures, I exaggerate a little, but there were some in which some exercise was taking place. This all took place in about 6 seconds, I bailed on him almost immediately, but not before I was scarred for life. Whenever I see him I cannot help but think of his skinny little butt-nekkid body in those pictures.

I get paid how much?


Link to original story

Getting Arrested @ Your Library

If you have not heard about this yet,,, read the following article...

Woman Arrested For Failing To Return Library Books

What I do not get is the bias associated with these types of stories. It is almost like the general public thinks that getting arrested for stealing public goods is outrageous and ridiculous. Why would you not get arrested for stealing library books? You get arrested for stealing from a store don’t you? If you borrow your neighbors car for a month too long, you will also get arrested. So what makes library books different? You might say “Because Minks you numbskull, they are cheap!”. What difference does that make? Stealing is stealing. You do not hear about Blockbuster or Netflix (other places you can ‘borrow’ items) arresting people because they simply charge your credit card for the indefinitely borrowed item(s). In fact, no place else is there such a setup where you can borrow a significant amount of valuable merchandise with no security deposit what-so-ever.

Lets looks at some different items and the ramifications from not paying them….

1) Store – Arrested (Shoplifting)

2) Utility Bills – Utilities cut off

3) Auto (and numerous other goods) – Repossession

4) House – Foreclosure

5) Apartment – Eviction

6) Credit Cards – Bankruptcy (and about 4 billion calls a day from creditors)

7) Uncle – Punched in nose

That leaves us with library books….

Library – Fines (enforceable by arrest)

Lets compare the above options and see if any would work for library books…

Option 1 = Arrest. What we have now. Seems to work, but some think too extreme

Option 2 = Cut off service. We can, and do, cut off service. But, unlike cable or electricity, the library is a service that can be sacrificed for a very long time. Besides, the library down the street will let me check out books no problemo.

Option 3 = Repossession. Yea, if they cannot find the books, like we would be able to.

Option 4 = Foreclosure. Not applicable here in any way that I can see.

Option 5 = Evictions. Kick them out of the library service area. And you thought arrest was bad.

Option 6 = Bankruptcy. Actually, bankruptcy does work, at least in my library. But few actually do it.

Option 7= Physical Abuse. Uncle Vinnie Style. While I kinda like this one, I am fairly certain it will not float.

So, really, what else are you gonna do other then arrest them? I have heard some say “just chalk it up to the cost of doing business and don’t worry about it”. Exsqueeze me?? Personally I think that stealing from a library is a pretty reprehensible act. You are actually stealing from many people in one clean swoop. I am not willing to let such deeds just go like they are not big deal.

Ok,, back to the article for a second. Look how many times the city tried to contact her. 9. Nine! 6 letters, 2 phone calls, and a citation! This is a person that just really did not care what-so-ever about returning anything to the library. The only way you were going to get this person to return items was to force her. They did. She paid the $170 fine.

I think libraries should be able to rate patrons kinda like credit card companies rate people. When you first get a card, you are a “Bronze Member” and you can check out three items at a time. After you check out and return 100 items, you are now a “Silver Member” and can check out 10 items at a time. After you check out another,,,, oh,, say,,, 250 items, you are now a “Gold Member” and can have unlimited checkouts. Now, with a valid credit card or deposit, you can buy your way right to “Gold Member” status. But, that is actually against ALA rules, so I guess that is out.

In the mean time,,

Arrest Them All, Let the Law Sort Them Out.

I had always heard, that as the economy slips into recession, or even declines, that library use increases. There are even numbers to back that up, based on previous recessions. However, what effect does gas prices sky-rocketing in conjunction with a declining economy have on library usage stats?

I will tell you that at my library, it is having some negative effects. Basically, the majority (about 53% actually) have at least a 10 minute drive to get to the library. Lets say that they drive 5 miles to get to the library. That means that based on 20mpg they are blowing half a gallon to get here and then back home. So, essentially, they are paying almost $2 to go to the library. it would seem that for the demographic that frequents public libraries, that is too much. Our stats are seeing double digit decreases over the last 4 months (both in door count and circs). I will crunch some number here after 12 months, but I suspect there is a direct correlation between gas price and library use... that I can then use to calculate future library use based on gas prices in the future. Should be a fun model.

I wonder if this is going to be a national trend?

Peek a Boo!

In yet another installment of my fabulous perverts in libraries series, I bring you a good old fashioned peeping tom! It would appear that 38 year old Robert Pfantz was taking a little too much time in the mens room one afternoon. That, and he was peeping through a rather large hole between the stalls hoping to get a glimpse at other mens nekkid bodies. I will admit this story is not very shocking. The guy barely even qualifies as a pervert. He is obviously gay, and in a room with lots of other men with their pants down. A recipe for hilarity. What I thought was actually more interesting is the name the school has for the third floor of their library. It is affectionately known as "sin floor" for all the sexual shenanigans that take place there. The story goes on to tell of all the fonicatery that goes on up in the various 3rd floor bathrooms.

The sad thing is, my library is one big sin floor itself. We find used condoms in the bathrooms and 'used' pornography from time to time too. Other then libraries and adult bookstores, what other businesses typically have "sin floors"? Not too many. We have the monopoly on that. Yay!

Link to Story

Who are you?

Should librarians have to wear nametags? Some say it is just asking for trouble.

In this article, Stephen Abram, A SirsiDynix VP, had this to say…

“If we want to be treated as professionals,” he said, librarians shouldn’t wear badges that say merely “Librarian” without their name. He mocked those who say, “I don’t want to tell anybody my name, I might be stalked,” suggesting it doesn’t occur to workers at Wal-Mart. If you want to be treated like a professional, you have start acting like one,” he said. (link)

I have heard from several librarians that they are fully opposed to putting their names on name tags for fear of stalking. They seem sincere about their concern, even fearful! At my library, we met in the middle. First names only on the nametags, unless you are management. I still think this is kind of silly since we are a public library and everything (almost) is public record. We work for the citizens. If they want our names, they are going to get them one way or another. We have no policy in place on how to handle name requests.

Here are the issues I see with nametags in public libraries…

Unless you have clear policies in place, if somebody wants to find out your name, they are going to find out your name. They may go to a co worker, or they may just peek at the stuff on your desk. They can go to city hall and ask for the names and salaries of all city employees. They might even follow you home. One way or another, if they want your name, they are going to get it.

Nametags, make you readily identifiable as a library staff member. This may seem like a bad idea, but in the long run, it is a great idea. Read any of my other posts? One of our goals as librarians needs to be to get our demand up. One way to do this is to make our helpful selves available to patrons. I am not saying we should wear bright orange vests, but some indicator of availability cannot hurt. Those of us with an education should try to tout this education. Maybe work it into the nametag somewhere? I know when I go to any professional I like to see all the certifications on his/her wall. It makes me feel like I am getting my monies worth. I like to see that the person violating me in various ways is a certified doctor. Patrons who see our titles and maybe even an “M.L.S.” tag might get the subtle positive feeling too.

I have also heard some say that that wearing nametags is itself is an unprofessional move. I can see both sides of this argument. Wearing a great big pink nametag shaped like a book using bubbly fonts is far from professional. Wearing a metal name tag with name and title in Arial is very professional. Doctors all wear name tags. They are pretty professional. Well, most of the time. So too are police officers.

Here is the rub, name tags are for the customer. They are not for employee. I would imagine you all know who you are by now. They are to make the customer feel more in touch with you. Therefore, nametags proliferate the service industry. Anybody that signs up to work in a service industry needs to understand they may be wearing a nametag. They need to understand the risks of working with people. Working with the public is not inherently safe. You hear all the time some story where disgruntled customers punch, spit, and even shoot unfortunate employees. It happens. If you are so terrified of the people you serve that you do not want them to know your name, you may be in the wrong industry. And again, it is not that hard to find out a persons name. If by some miracle you get a policy in place that does make it hard to get your name, what kind of customer service is that? Heaven forbid you have a couple of really crappy people working for you. They piss off a bunch of patrons. The patron asks for their name. They tell the patron “It is against policy for me to give you my name, so sorry”. How do you think the patron would feel? If you were the patron, how would you feel?

Alas, nametags should be worn at all times. Last names are optional, but do not fool yourselves into thinking that this is in any significant way safer. Do not think that wearing no tags is somehow going to keep you safe. Nametags are a cheap and effective way to bond with the patrons and to relay a sense of competence. Remember who you work for.

Beware of Perverts Bearing Candy

Another pervert was busted at a library... big surprise - NOT!

Article

What is surprising tho, is the fascinating array of child abduction equipment found in his car. Authorities said they found "disturbing items" — including blankets, ropes and duct tape — in the trunk of Ballard's car and a bag of candy in the glove box. Ah yes, the proverbial bag of candy,,, standard fare in any abductor's toolkit. Thank goodness a staff member was not fearful of contacting authorities. As you are all aware, doing so can cost you your job! Stop a Pervert - Lose Your Job!

There is a reasonable chance that by ratting this dirt bag out, one (or more) children were saved from a very unpleasant experience. I am sure the ALA is not pleased with the 'ratting' but I am quite certain it was a good call.

I can assure you my kids are getting yet another "Stranger Danger!" lecture later today.

More Perverts!

This article struck me as particulary odd in that I can not make hide-nor-hair of what this fellow was up to.


Library Patron Squirting Womans Shoes

I can understand people masturbating in the library. I can understand men trying to peek up womans skirts. I can understand having sex in the bathrooms. I can even sorta understand smearing poop all over bathrooms walls,, but using a syringe to spray salt water on peoples shoes. I just don't get that one.

My only question is,, are they sure it was salt water? How exactly do they know it was salt water? Did they taste it?